Click here to send us your comments >> Alan, Phoenix, USA: Ariel Sharon may have once been the George S. Patton of Israel - but in his dotage he has chosen to be a even more pathetic Petain than his predecessor Napoleon Petain Barak was. And you Israelis deserve what you get if you keep these kinds of "leaders" in power. Not that Bibi would have been much better. He showed his weakness during the Hebron negotiations and at Wye, BUT he never released hundreds of killers, forced Jews from their homes, abandoned the South Lebanese Army, and reward terrorism as Barak and Sharon have. And it is one collective YAWN for the likes of Israelis whose homes were not handed over to Hamas, who prefer Munich over D-Day, and who may very well be the victims of Hamas AND Al Qaeda terror. The Peres, the Mitznas, the Sharons, Olmerts, and Larry Derfner types just don't get it. If you cannot stand firm - then please, don't tell us that you are our allies in the war against terrorism. For I don't see President Bush or Tony Blair negotiating with the likes of Osama as Sharon and his cronies and appeasers have chosen to do so with Abbas. Albert Bello, Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Caroline should remember, approximately two weeks ago Sharon promised to the nation that "ISRAEL WILL NOT TURN OVER ANY MORE LAND" without any benefit to the national security. However, Gaza is the testing ground which it may take a year or more to realize. As long as there is a weak partner for agreement, Israel should remain strong for any additional unilateral withdrawal due to get red of Palestinian population and draw its borders to annex. It will also serve the purpose to teach Palestinians and some leftist Israelis that "the borders will never be the 67 armistice line". If Israeli security intelligence and high ranking military officers should ever decide for more unilateral withdrawal, Palestinians of the West Bank should have less land to harvest terrorists militia and better IAF surveillance with no Jewish settlers around. Caroline, until we'll have peace, we are still at war. Can't afford to play politics. Fay Dicker, Lakewood, NJ, USA: Caroline Glick's brilliant expose of the ease with which the Sharon government has manipulated the media and public at large in the furtherance of a hidden agenda for "more land giveaways to the Palestinians," is eerily reminiscent of the tactics by which autocratic regimes the world over have successfully ruled over a credulous population. Olmert is the conduit for announcing radical initiatives which the government then "strenuously denies" is being considered The IDF is complicit in allaying the public's natural anxieties at the Palestinians' lawless and violent actions following the Gaza withdrawal, and any judicious retaliatory plan to pre-empt the anarchy from impacting on Israelis is deemed imprudent. Where are the incorruptible politicians who will lead Israel back from the brink of disaster? Regretfully I must agree with Moshe Morgenstern of Morristown, NJ that the ethically challenged Bibi is not the answer. Thomas Adler, Toronto, Canada: Ms. Glick gets it right every time. Why the nation doesn't follow her sound principles is simply that Israel is always held to a higher and much more stringent standard than any other nation in the world and Israel itself is infested with the shtetel mentality. As such rather than acting like any other nation, much less fulfilling its destiny to be a light unto the nations, Israel appeases the nations in a vain attempt to curry favor but only gets disdain and contempt. History has shown that Israel is respected by the nations when it stands strong and acts righteously and forcefully in its interest. The corrupt and undemocratic structure of government is in desperate need of reform and that must be prerequisite to any initiative in this direction. Rachel Ben David, Peduel, Israel: One of the problems of the political right in this country is the inability to both dream about what could be and make practical decisions given what is. (This skill comes easier to women than men.) Carolyn makes a cogent assessment of the current situation, including the obvious suggestion as to the next step. Getting behind the only candidate that has a chance of beating Sharon, despite some reservations about him, is the logical thing to do. Proving to politicians that they cannot make a 180 turn and vote against their constituencies without paying a price is paramount - even if it means electing a candidate that is not perfect himself. Karl Ohsberg, Brisbane, Australia: The controversial withdrawal from Gaza, seen as a victory by the Palestinians and a defeat by many Israelis, has a definite purpose - the advancement of Israel. Apart from the diplomatic coup, Israel has handed the Gazan Palestinians sole responsibility for their own fate - and their actions. They may complain that their 'jail' has only been enlarged, but such a claim only displays their determination to cling to victimhood. Now they have been granted considerable freedom of action and isolated from those they would kill for their own misfortunes. The world can witness and judge the Gazans by their deeds. Israel is now free to devote its military resources to defend a security barrier and not fight a 'civil war'. Sure, the Gazans can lob a few primitive rockets at some Israeli villages, but the IDF can now act swiftly and decisively anywhere in Gaza with greater resources and without the hindrance of protecting its own people in Gaza. Ernest Axelrad: Gratitude to Caroline Glick for this and the previous Column One articles. Thanks to The Jerusalem Post - the newspaper unique in this world of, at best, half-truth! Michael Tamasi, Tel-Aviv: And when a new, less cynical government shall come about, I surely hope that Caroline Glick would be one of the decision-makers. Michael Podolsky, Atlanta, Georgia: Caroline, you are one of the few in our country who understands our predicament and the plight of our people. I admire you and salute you. Israel, home to the Jewish people is a beautiful land. Unfortunately it is a tragedy what goes on there everyday. We are playing right into the hands of our enemies. We must do all that it takes, and is vital for our survival, security for our people. Skip Kelley, Sunnyvale, CA, USA: Not only is our leadership in the US and Israel and the PA corrupt and weak and focused on helping wealthy "insiders", but it is also stupid. I think Iran is doing everything it can to keep the United States pre-occupied with the war in Iraq; and it is doing the same to Israel by encouraging, supporting, and funding terrorists; they are doing this so that we won't be able to turn our full attention and resources against them; Iran is "working" us and distracting us, so it can have time and cover to develop weapons of mass destruction. They are much smarter than we give them credit for. This is the BIG STORY. What is really scary is it is possible we know what they are up to; and it is also possible we don't know what they are up to. The answer to this challenge is not democracy in the Middle East. We need democracy first in Israel, the United States, the PA, and Iraq. We are being internally "worked" by the very wealthy with their sophisticated paid consultants and focus groups. They are pitting us against each other and then running their candidates in all major parties. Their candidates know exactly what to say, they get elected, and forget about us. They are preoccupied with their corruption schemes. They are not tending the store. Without the moral authority of having honest government that truly represents us, it is like we are fighting with our hands tied behind our backs while inside a canvas bag. We are fighting two enemies - external ones and internal ones. I'm not cynical. It doesn't have to be this way. I am angry. I don't want this to continue. We have to find a way to stop it. Moshe Morgenstern, Morristown, NJ USA: Once again, Caroline Glick has hit the nail on the head attributing Sharon's victory to the lack of meaningful contender against him. However, if she is implying that Bibi is a viable prospect I would respectfully disagree. Merely being able to win an election in Israel should no longer be the sole criteria for selecting a leader of for the growing segment of the population that resists the "land for pace" suicide pact. Bibi has disgraced himself as badly or worse then Sharon. There is no reason to believe that he will not continue to do so. Better for the Land of Israel front to spend some time in the political wilderness, reconsolidate our forces and return to the battle with a candidate not tainted by any of the Oslo disease. Mikhail Osterfeld, Falls Church, Virginia, USA: Caroline Glick's faith in Netanyahu and the Likud is misplaced. The latest Likud fiasco only serves as yet another stark reminder of the irredeemable corruption of that party and of Israel's entire political system. Israel needs a new voice, an honest voice, a principled voice, above all a Jewish and Nationalist voice. Only a new party, untainted by the corruption of the present establishment and powered by a grass roots movement can be an answer to the situation. Sadly, no such party has existed in Israel since Ghandi Zeevi was shot and Kahane's party was banned. It is high time somebody founded one. Yehoshua Friedman, Kochav Hashachar, Israel: Caroline, I agree with your analysis except for the vain hope that The country will rally around Netanyahu. Netanyahu gave away Hebron when he was prime minister, leading to the disgusting sniper death of the baby Shalhevet Pass. As finance minister in the Sharon government he was the architect of the policy that pulled the plug on child allowances. This was part of a blatant attempt by the new secular coalition to reduce family size in order to prevent the religous population from becoming a majority in a few years. He also cynically waited until the very last moment to jump ship before the expulsion. The Oriental, national-religious and hareidi public, as well as residents of the Negev now exposed to missiles, will not vote for Bibi. Rabbi Alan Green, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: Another cogent analysis from Ms. Glick. It's difficult to see what Israel gains by surrendering concrete assets to the Palestinians in exchange for nothing in return. No, worse than nothing--because the Palestinians promptly turn around and use those assets to ramp up their weaponry and strategic position for the next stage of jihad. And if this is perceived to be a way to force the Palestinians to lay their destructive cards on the table, it won't help. The world refuses to see the Palestinians for what they are, no more than it was willing to see who Hitler really was--until it was almost too late (for the six million, tragically, it WAS too late). Hopefully Israel will have the strength to act unambiguously in its own self-interest, before events spin completely out of control. Jorge Ruiz: Israel has a democratic deficit and the Siberian winter in the civil servant media will end with fracture the elite of Israel and the people. Most Israelis are not representated in the traditional parties, and the Tel Aviv elite thinks the rest of the country are their "sucker" servants. Only a strong civic movement to reestablish democracy will change this circle. Just for democratic hygiene. Caroline Glick - always lucid and brilliant. ALEX SANDOR, TORONTO, CANADA: The bottom line is that Egypt and Jordan, both of which are Judenrein, will only recognize a complete return to the 1967 "Auschwitz borders". Since the "Palestinians" also will insist on the "right of return" the end game is the abolition of the only kafir (infidel) state in the Middle East.
More about: | Toronto, Winnipeg, Falls Church, Virginia, Brisbane |