Jordan says chose not be flexible with Israel after cancels treaty annexes

On the anniversary of the assassination of former prime minister Yitzhak Rabin, King Abdullah announced his intention to cancel the annexes to the peace agreement with Israel.

Netanyahu on the Jordan peace agreement, October 22, 2018 (GPO)
Senior Jordanian officials in Amman told the Al-Hayat newspaper on Monday that the kingdom could have shown greater flexibility in dealing with Israel, but chose not to.
The statement came after Jordan announced its decision to cancel the annexes of the peace treaty between the two countries, which dealt with Israel’s lease of the Island of Peace in Naharayim and the Tzofar enclave in the Arava by Israel.
According to the sources, Amman could have been more flexible on the issue of renewing annexes to the peace agreement, but it encountered stubborn policies from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition, including positions on Jerusalem and other holy places.
On the anniversary of the assassination of former prime minister Yitzhak Rabin, who signed the peace treaty with King Hussein, King Abdullah announced his intention to cancel the annexes to the peace agreement with Israel.
Under the 1994 Treaty of Peace between Israel and Jordan, these two areas “will fall under Jordanian sovereignty with Israeli private land use rights. These rights include unimpeded freedom of entry to, exit from and movement within the area. These areas are not subject to customs or immigration legislation. These rights will remain in force for 25 years and will be renewed automatically for the same period unless either country wishes to terminate the arrangement, in which case consultations will be taken.”
“This has always been our top priority,” King Abdullah wrote on Twitter, “and our decision to withdraw from the annexes to the peace agreement is based on our desire to take what is needed for Jordan and the Jordanians.”
According to a report in The Jordan Times, the king’s decision followed a request from government activists to not renew the agreement and to revoke Israeli ownership from Jordanian land.
Both areas are used by Israel for agricultural purposes.
Eyal Blum, head of the Central Arava Regional Council, said in response to Jordan’s decision, “The agricultural areas in the Tzofar enclave are very significant in terms of security of the region, livelihood and agriculture in the central Arava. This means the collapse of 30 agricultural farms on an area of 1,400 dunams [350 acres].
“I call upon Prime Minister Netanyahu to resolve this crisis immediately,” Blum said. “Apart from the agricultural importance of the areas, they constitute a buffer between the inhabited areas in the Arava and the kingdom of Jordan.”
Agriculture Minister Uri Ariel announced on Sunday that he instructed the director-general of the Agriculture Ministry to prepare for a scenario in which the Jordanians implement their decision.
“The farmers will not remain alone,” he said. “We will find the best solution for them.”
According to the agreement, the annex governing the two areas will “be renewed automatically for the same periods, unless one-year prior notice of termination is given by either party, in which case, at the request of either party, consultations shall be entered into.”
Zionist Union leader Avi Gabbay told his faction meeting on Monday that Abdullah’s decision was further proof that Netanyahu is not the great statesman people claim him to be. Gabbay met two weeks ago with the king, but the issue of discontinuing parts of the peace agreement between Israel and Jordan was not raised at the meeting by either side.
Herb Keinon, Khaled Abu Toameh and Gil Hoffman contributed to this report.