Ex-deputy NSC chief: Russia may help in Syria to avoid dogfight with Israel

“The only way Israel can achieve gains” in limiting Iran’s footprint in Syria is “through the Russians. The Syrians also do not want to be taken over by the Iranians, but Russia has the key."

By YONAH JEREMY BOB
Updated: JULY 3, 2018 09:15
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu shaking hands with Russian Preisdent Vladimir Putin (photo credit: AMOS BEN GERSHOM, GPO)
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu shaking hands with Russian Preisdent Vladimir Putin
(photo credit: AMOS BEN GERSHOM, GPO)
Russia may assist Israel in placing limits on Iranian activities in Syria to avoid a direct aerial clash with Israel, former deputy national security council chief Chuck Freilich has told the Jerusalem Post.
As Syria reasserts control of its side of the Golan border and Israel, according to foreign reports, continued to target Iranian activities in Syria last week, Freilich said that, “the last thing Russia wants is one of its aircraft shot down by Israel. Then it would need to respond to that.”
“The only way Israel can achieve gains” in limiting Iran’s footprint in Syria is “through the Russians. The Syrians also do not want to be taken over by the Iranians, but in the end, the key is really the Russians,” he said.
Freilich said that, “I do not think Vladimir Putin wants a significant clash in Syria. This could risk the Russian position there…Is he going to give us exactly what we want? No. But that” does not mean that some balance cannot be worked out with Russian assistance.
Importantly, he warned that, “we are a frenetic country with a minimal attention span. We had a good day in May where we took out a large part of Iran’s presence in Syria. At the moment, we are feeling good. But I think there is a fundamental difference in the Iranian and Syrian approach versus the US approach.”
Iran and Syria are both “there for the long haul. They have strategic patience. This may be a setback for them, but Iran has a fundamental strategic interest in Syria which they aren’t going to give up. We can hit them, and we can make the price higher…but at the end, if they want to set up a presence, they will.”
He dismissed the periodic US promises of support in Syria, saying, “I question whether the US has the commitment - I just don’t see it,” noting the US is at most protecting a small presence of Syrian rebels in eastern Syria to limit a return of ISIS, but otherwise has a limited role.
Russia says only Syrian army should be on country"s southern border, May 28, 2018 (Reuters)
A Related Video You May Like:
 
What balance would Israel want Russia to help it achieve regarding Iran’s presence in Syria?
Numbers have been tossed around for months about how far Iranian-associated forces might be able to be kept from the border with a 60 kilometer no-go zone being on the high end and a 10-25 kilometer zone being on the low-end. 
Freilich said that 60 kilometers “would be optimistic. The real question is can we live with a presence above a zero presence, and with what may become a bigger presence around 10 kilometers from the border.” He said the key was to make sure that any Iranian ground forces presence was far enough off that direct clashes would be avoidable.
Elaborating he said that, “no one really cares about a few thousand militia men. But what if it is only a few thousand at the beginning? Then they add a few thousand more. Then they move from rifles to rocket propelled grenades, then short range rockets, then long range rockets with precision capability.”
Eventually this could become a second Hezbollah-style Lebanon front, which was the scenario that Israel was trying to head-off before it starts becoming a reality, the former deputy NSC chief stated.
He said that, “Hezbollah has around 130,000 rockets in Lebanon. Add a few tens of thousands in Syria and suddenly you have two major fronts. This divides Israel’s attention. I do not know what political constraints might come up given two fronts. Right now, Israel has freedom of action in Syria, but not in Lebanon with Hezbollah because they have created a balance of terror.”
Freilich said that this would be more dangerous than Iran’s own ballistic missile capability from its soil stemming from its around 400 rockets which can reach Israel.
Taking into account “a conservative estimate” of shooting down 80% of them using the Arrow antimissile system, probably only a few dozen would get through - as with Iraq during the 1991 Gulf War. In contrast, rockets stationed in Syria could get through in much larger and more devastating numbers.
“So what are our real red lines? What kind of Iranian presence can we accept and what can’t we accept? We can’t accept missiles, rockers or attack drones - not at any distance. Some Shiite-affiliated troops we can tolerate at a certain distance from the border,” he said.
Encouraging the IDF to maintain its current balance of attacking Iranian forces when needed to keep pressure on Russia and Syria to restrain Iran, but “not doing it at a level which would force them into a major response,” he said that “there is no precise recipe” for using force on the border.
He was pessimistic about how all of this will intertwine with the Iran nuclear deal crisis, predicting that Iran’s regime will not fall and that the Trump administration has no back-up plan.
“What’s going to happen in the next few months is Iran will find out Europe has little choice, but to play along with the sanctions. At some point, Iran will slowly start pulling out” of the nuclear deal and the US will leave Israel with problems with Iran in Syria and the question of how to stop it from moving toward a nuclear weapon.